Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rudolf Molleker vs Pedro Sakamoto Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Molleker vs Sakamoto analysis and find out who is favored!
Rudolf Molleker vs Pedro Sakamoto Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Molleker 1 - 0 Sakamoto
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Molleker has won 54.1% of points on their second serve, while Sakamoto has won 47.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Molleker, in recent form, has won 49.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sakamoto has won 53.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.68% and 36.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Molleker has saved 60.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sakamoto has saved 55.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Molleker has won 54.05% of matches played (W/L 40/ 34), with Sakamoto winning 59.42% (W/L 41/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Molleker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 160/ 113), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7). Sakamoto has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 370/ 271), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 31/ 34).
- Player level: In the last year, Molleker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.06% of matches (W/L 36/ 26), where as Sakamoto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.39% of matches (W/L 31/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Molleker winning 1 times and Sakamoto being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Molleker winning 2 and Sakamoto winning 0. The last match between Molleker and Sakamoto was at the M25 Bodrum, 25-05-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Rudolf Molleker getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Molleker and Sakamoto have played a deciding set 0 times, with Molleker winning 0 times and Sakamoto 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Molleker winning 0, and Sakamoto 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Molleker has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.24 while Sakamoto has played against players with an average rank of 309.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Molleker has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sakamoto has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Molleker has converted 44.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sakamoto has converted 49.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
196
Rank
146
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
304
Rank
284
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
54% (221-190)
Career Total W/L
57% (403-307)
52% (17-16)
YTD W/L
50% (13-13)
$290,500
Career Prize Money
$20,740
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Rudolf Molleker | Pedro Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rudolf Molleker | Pedro Sakamoto |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (17/16) | 50% (13/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (42/32) | 54% (30/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (353/336) | 52% (258/240) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 50% (12/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 253 | 54 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 89 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:52 | 1:33:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 292.52 | 234.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1283/2124) | 60% (926/1540) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (941/1283) | 64% (596/926) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (455/841) | 47% (289/614) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (72/161) | 49% (82/166) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (757/2107) | 43% (638/1484) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (13/11) | 40% (8/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (17/32) | 52% (13/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 11% (1/9) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (22/17) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (22/5) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 8% (13/1) |
Rudolf Molleker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
James Duckworth
Player
Rudolf Molleker
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Joan Nadal
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Rudolf Molleker
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
50%
(
56 of
111)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Rudolf Molleker
48%
(
43 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Rudolf Molleker
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Jaime Faria
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Francesco Passaro
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Rudolf Molleker
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Pedro Sakamoto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Luis Queiroz Miguel
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Fernandez
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
16
Total Points Won
12
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Molleker Vs Sakamoto Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Molleker are available here and Sakamoto photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Pedro Sakamoto
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
